Spread the love

Brush layering: A revegetation technique to revegetate and stabilize streambanks and slopes: Brush layering is a revegetation technique that stabilises and revegetates slopes and streambanks by combining soil with layers of rooted or dormant cuttings.

Description

Instead of living fascines, brush layering involves placing live chopped branches and rooted plants in layers into dug terraces and filling them with compacted soil material.

Brush layers, which are linear constructions, are typically finished with plantation or sowing.

As they are positioned at the bottom of excavated terraces, the cuttings’ tips, containing leaves and buds, escape the slope and can intercept rainwater, limit water flow, and entrap soil sediments (Figure 1). On the other hand, the stem of the cuttings enters the slope and acts as a tensile nail inclusion, reinforcing the soil (Bischetti et al., 2010).

Advantages:

Rey (2009) recommends immediate protection from the first vegetative year for slopes with a steepness of less than 40%.

Suitable for extremely steep slopes.

The deeper the root growth, the stronger the stabilising impact.

Disadvantages:

High demand for materials;

Not appropriate for slopes with limited equipment access (trenches are difficult to implement).

Not recommended for rocky slopes or poor water content.

Figure 1. Brush layering along a steep slope. (California Department of Transportation: http://www.dot.ca.gov/)

 

Modified brush layers

Modified brush layers can also be used on very steep slopes where rolling rocks or derbis might descend, gather speed, and destroy the plant.

These are brush layers supported by a tiny log or board (2 m long and at least 5 m thick) that form a little terrace to chatch potential derbis or small boulders.

They should be spread across the slope to maximise the odds of capturing the potential masses (Figure 2).

Reinforcing steel bar one metre long and 15 mm in diameter can be used as a strong support to keep the modified brush layers in place (Polster, 1999).

"Figure

Figure 2. Top figure: Modified brush layers in Canada (Rey et al., 2019). Bottom figure: (a) Modified brush layers staggered across a slope, (b) detail of a modified brush layer prior to backfilling, (c) detail of the normal backfill which creates a bit of a bench (Polster, 1999).

Design methods

Brush layering has been widely implemented over the world, following criteria provided by various handbooks based on previous experience (e.g., Schiechtl, 1980; Grey and Sotir, 1996) regarding bench width, inward inclination, and spacing.

Trenches are typically 0.5 to 1.5 meters deep, with spacing distances ranging from 1 to 2 meters depending on the slope aspect (Florineth et al., 2002).

The cuttings should be at least 50 cm long, with a diameter of 2-4 cm and tips that reach 10 to 20 cm from the slope surface (Figure 3).

The average number of cuttings is 20 per linear metre (Rey, 2009). Work is done from the bottom up, so soil excavated from the previous trench can be utilised to fill the next shelf.

This approach can also be used to produce a new slope of fill material. In this case, the live cuttings can be longer (1-5 m), and the slope is created by compacting the soil layer by layer.

Brush layers should be at least 10° sloped, with points protruding from the slope surface (Morgan & Rickson, 1995). Bischetti et al. (2010) proposed a new approach for brush layering design that is based on the computation of the Factor of Safety using equilibrium limit equations and takes into account brush layer design parameters.

Based on this novel model, they found that by employing half of the live materials traditionally used in this procedure, the same stabilisation can be achieved at a significantly lower cost and time.

Installation occurs during the plant’s dormant season.

Materials: Branch cuttings and rooted plants with aventious root growth (such as Salix tetrasperma, Salix purpurea, and Salix incana).

Functional Suitability Criteria

Type of Movement

Descriptor Rating Notes
Fall 2 Brush layering is used for both controlling flowing prone slopes and for reinforcing potential slide surfaces.
Topple 0
Slide 8
Spread 2
Flow 7

Material Type

Descriptor Rating Notes
Earth 9 Most suitable for earth soil and for entrapping debris sediments along the slope. Not suitable for rock slopes, because the brushes cannot be fixed properly, and vegetation cannot be established.
Debris 8
Rock 2

This database are not referenced living materials like plants stakes and seeds. With this technique of brush layering, it is possible to use rooted plants installed with buried stems sub-horizontally in the same manner as living stakes.

With buried stems, it is possible to work successfully also in Mediterranean sites with long summer aridity or in sites with water scarcity.

Depth of Movement

Descriptor Rating Notes
Surficial (< 0.5 m) 10 Measure used for both controlling erosion of surficial layers and stabilizing shallow covers. The trenches can reach up to 1 m of depth and roots can grow deeper.
Shallow (0.5 to 3 m) 6
Medium (3 to 8 m) 1
Deep (8 to 15 m) 0
Very deep (> 15 m) 0

Living materials as plants or living stakes choice is very relevant to the success of the project.

Rate of Movement

Descriptor Rating Notes
Moderate to fast 2 Adequate for contrasting small volumes of slow-moving soil. Less suitable for contrasting higher volumes of fast-moving soil.
Slow 6
Very slow 8
Extremely slow 10

Ground Water Conditions

Descriptor Rating Notes
Artesian 7 Applicable irrespective of groundwater conditions. Indirect effects on groundwater levels due to root-water uptake from plants during evapotranspiration.
High 8
Low 7
Absent 5

In arid conditions, use rooted plants with buried stems instead of living stakes.

Surface Water

Descriptor Rating Notes
Rain 9 Typically used for reducing the rainsplash erosion. This technique is effective when placed in riverbanks.
Snowmelt 7
Localized 7
Stream 8
Torrent 2
River 8

Reliability and Feasibility Criteria

Criteria Rating Notes
Reliability 8 A well-implemented measure can be reliable permanently.
Feasibility and Manageability</td

References

  • Bischetti, G. B., Chiaradia, E. A., D’agostino, V., & Simonato, T. (2010). Quantifying the effect of brush layering on slope stability. Ecological Engineering, 36(3), 258-264.

  • Florineth, F., Rauch, H. P., & Staffler, H. (2002). Stabilization of landslides with bio-engineering measures in South Tyrol/Italy and Thankot/Nepal. In International Congress INTERPRAEVENT 2002 in the Pacific Rim-Matsumoto/Japan Congress Publication (Vol. 2, pp. 827-837).

  • Gray, D.H., Sotir, R., 1996. Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization. A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  • Polster, D. F. (1999, November). Soil Bioengineering for Steep/Unstable Slopes and Riparian Restoration. In Fourth Annual Roads, Rails and Environment Workshop, November(Vol. 2, No. 3, p. 1999).

  • Rey, F. (2009). A strategy for fine sediment retention with bioengineering works in eroded marly catchments in a mountainous Mediterranean climate (Southern Alps, France). Land Degradation & Development, 20(2), 210-216.

  • Rey, F., Bifulco, C., Bischetti, G. B., Bourrier, F., De Cesare, G., Florineth, F., … & Peklo, K. (2019). Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration. Science of The Total Environment, 648, 1210-1218.

  • Schiechtl, H.M., 1980. Bioengineering for Land Reclamation and Conservation. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Canada

  • Stangl, R. (2007). Hedge brush layers and live crib walls—stand development and benefits. In Eco-and Ground Bio-Engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability (pp. 287-296). Springer, Dordrecht.Brush layering: A revegetation technique to revegetate and stabilize streambanks and slopes

 

(LARIMIT. (n.d.). https://www.larimit.com/mitigation_measures/1018/)

7 thoughts on “Brush layering: A revegetation technique to revegetate and stabilize streambanks and slopes”

  1. Заказать Хавал – только у нас вы найдете разные комплектации. Быстрей всего сделать заказ на хавейл джолион цена можно только у нас!
    [url=https://jolion-ufa1.ru]haval jolion купить уфа новый[/url]
    хавейл джолион цена – [url=https://jolion-ufa1.ru/]https://www.jolion-ufa1.ru/[/url]

  2. Cekpot vurmaq istəyirsiniz? Pinco Casino-da ən böyük mükafatlar sizi gözləyir
    pinco casino az [url=http://www.pincocasinogiris-az.com]http://www.pincocasinogiris-az.com[/url] .

  3. Современные технологии в производстве светодиодных светильников для дома и бизнеса
    светотехника цены [url=http://proizvodstvo-svetodiodnih-svetilnikov.ru/]http://proizvodstvo-svetodiodnih-svetilnikov.ru/[/url] .

  4. Камера заднего вида с функцией ночного видения — четкая картинка даже в темноте
    камера заднего вида комплект купить [url=http://www.camera-zadnego-vida.ru]http://www.camera-zadnego-vida.ru[/url] .

  5. Пропуск для Газели в центр – работаем без посредников и лишних комиссий
    пропуск в центр для газели цена [url=https://propusk-v-centr-dlya-gazeli.ru/]https://propusk-v-centr-dlya-gazeli.ru/[/url] .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore More

Vetiver: a grass with several advantages Excellent for numerous uses, including landside control

Spread the loveSusan Bhattarai, Vetiver Nepal Kathmandu Nepal:A kind of grass originally from tropical Asia, vetiver has been brought to the tropics in both hemispheres and has since escaped cultivation

प्रयोगविहीन जग्गामा भेटिवरको खेतीः आर्थिक क्रान्ति सम्भव

Spread the loveबाढी पहिरो र नदीको भेलका कारण नेपालमा बर्षेनी ठूलो परिमाणमा खेतीयोग्य जग्गा बगरमा परिणत भएर प्रयोगहीन अवस्थामा पुगिरहेको छ । अहिले नै करिब ५ लाख हेक्टर यस्तो जग्गा

भेटिभर रोपौं, ल्यान्डफिल स्वच्छ बनाऔं

Spread the loveकाठमाडौं, पोखराजस्ता देशका ठूला सहरमा फोहोर व्यवस्थापनसँगै ल्यान्डफिल साइटको वातावरण जोगाउने मुख्य चुनौती देखिएको छ। ल्यान्डफिल साइट वरिपरिको मानवीय जीवनको रक्षा र फोहोर व्यवस्थापन गर्न ठोस उपाय पनि